Sunday, 30 December 2007
Robert plays with his toys.
Thursday, 27 December 2007
Christmas carols.

My Sister's book is now available in UK
My sister has written a Children's book based around Children travelling through time to World War 2 Britain. Obviously I am not the most objective reviewer, but it is a rollicking read, and is incredibly well researched (Annette has a PhD in History).
The book is now available in the UK on Amazon.co.uk at the following link:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Dont-Know-Where-When-Snipesville/dp/0979476941
It is well worth a look.
Advert ends.
Friday, 14 December 2007
Thursday, 13 December 2007
Saturday, 17 November 2007
Friday, 16 November 2007
I used to be somebody!
Actually, this was really interesting as he was awake and not indicating he wanted fed for about half an hour, he was finally taking stock of his surroundings. I only caught him right at the end as his eyelids got heavy.
Getting out and about.

It's pictured here, but to stop screens cracking all over the world I've avoided using a picture of me (actually we forgot to take one).
It was a great trip, and the advantages of not having a push chair to haul about became quickly apparent. The only problem was that Robert does like to burrow himself into his winter outer clothes, so that he disappears from view, but we had this problem in the pram as well.
So we were able to have our weekly crossword and coffee session. SO here is photo of me having my cake and eating it.
Tuesday, 13 November 2007
My team gets mentioned on national television!
Sunday, 11 November 2007
Why all parents are really boring

Friday, 9 November 2007
More baby pictures and videos.



Thursday, 8 November 2007
Introducing: Robert Laing


I promised myself that I wouldn't take loads of pictures, but here is another (and maybe a video of Robert after I had to take him to his new room.
Thursday, 25 October 2007
The Dark is Rising

Monday, 22 October 2007
Noooooooo! I bought Betamax again.

Saturday, 29 September 2007
National Child Care Trust Classes and Wardrobes

In the end though, it was a really good course. Weel taught, with lots of activities for people with my kind of attention span. More importantly we met a bunch of really interesting folk, who hopefully will be some kind of support network in the coming months.
Meanwhile, on another baby related note the cot is nowcomplete and in the baby's room. This sentence alone is more frightening and odd than a Stephen King novel about haunted garden gnomes.
Monday, 24 September 2007
Bands with great bassists

Sunday, 9 September 2007
Guitar Hero 2

Saturday, 25 August 2007
Sarah gets married.

Friday, 24 August 2007
Great book shops.

It was a great shop for us to choose books for the school, as the selection available was so top notch, but the neatness bothered me. When I was young my parents would take me to Foyle's on the Charing Cross road. I loved Foyle's, which at the time claimed to be the biggest bookshop in the world (a claim that seems laughable in this days of Borders and Waterstones). Largest or not it was certainly the messiest. In it's labyrinthian interior there were piles of books everywhere and I always had the impression that nobody had a clue what books were there. They also had a Victorian way of selling you books which involved receipts and a cashier on a different floor from most the books. This shop had character even if it may or may not have contained the tome you were searching for, and the staff may or may not have helped you in your quest depending on their mood . I miss the way Foyle's was, it's now modernised and isn't the same. A little bit of me knows I'll never find a book shop where I will feel so at home.
A Little Englander missing a rose coloured past, or a slob with a pathological hatred of order, you decide.
Wednesday, 22 August 2007
Mercedes servicing.

Tuesday, 21 August 2007
Spamalot at the Palace Theatre. A surreal day out in London part two.

I'm really embarrassed to say I went to this. Over the years I have been appalled at the number of West End shows using established brand names: Abba, Queen, Dirty dancing and various others. I have also always been suspicious of fans of TV shows going to see plays just because actor x was in show y. And yet, here I was watching a musical based on one of my favourite shows (Monty Python), starring Peter Davison (from Doctor Who). I felt positively dirty for doing this.
Having purchased a seat in the balcony of the palace theatre, so high up you should get an oxygen mask, and so steep you feel like at any moment you are going to tip to your death, I settled down to an enjoyable couple of hours. This is an odd one though, it has a great film script as a basis (which it lifts from liberally) and at least two cracking musical numbers ready to go (Knights of the Round Table and Always Look on the bright side of Life), and yet it didn't quite hit the mark.
The show as a spectacle is excellent. Everything from video projection, spiralling scenery and expensive trees, to dance set pieces, excellent special effects and rollicking musical hall song pastiches. There was a large live orchestra and the performance of the cast was to a very high standard but it just didn't work for one big reason. Harry Enfield once said that comedy songs just are not generally funny, and it was the songs I thought that let this down. Most of the numbers were designed to make fun of musical theatre, but this has been done before (The Producers), not forgetting that most musicals are high camp extravaganzas anyway. Southpark the Musical also did this, and I wonder why everybody lines up to kick a victim that is already down. The staging had a heavy American influence (maybe because Eric Idle lives there) which seemed at odds to the peculiarly English humour of the Pythons material.
Where the show did succeed was in managing to stage scenes from the film, the Black Knight, the bunny, the hand of god, which must have seemed impossible to stage. The cast were asked to sing, dance, and perform comedy all at the same time and they did so with real professionalism. Amy Field was an excellent singer, but it was her Character of 'The lady in the Lake' that got lumbered with most of the annoying pastiche duties.
Peter Davison has some of the same qualities of Graham Chapman, such as an ability to project a person just confused with the modern world, and so he seemed an inspired piece of casting for Arthur. He did a capable job of the comedy, and looked nimble enough in the dance routines (although his involvement was limited in these compared to everyone else). His singing though sounded a little like he was struggling, well, compared to all these young identikit uber-performers that made up the rest of the cast. Generally though he stood up well as the focus point of the story.
I did laugh, but less than when watching the film or reading the script. Do these first, before going to see this. I saw Les Miserables at the Palace theatre, and I would go to see this ahead of Spamalot. All in all I saw three films surreal films and a musical trying to be surreal today, but how can something be surreal when it is based on sketches we know so well? Right, I'm off to find a shrubbery.
Dali and film exhibition at the Tate Modern. A surreal day in London part one.

The exhibition itself looked at Dali's association with film making. This was done by collecting a series of films, photos and paintings with cinematic links. The films were shown in gallery rooms converted into small cinemas. The films themsleves covered a wide time line of the Moustached ones career. Ranging from 1929 to 1975.
I went twice, because the first time I really didn't have time to sit and watch the films, and as this was really the point of the whole thing, that seemed a waste. The design of the cinema rooms didn't help the situation first time round as they seemed to discourage casual viewing. This time I found sapces on the floor at the front, so that I was actually able to see the screens, rather than the backs of peoples heads.
So after all that, what did I think of the films? My first general comment is Surrealist films are great in a gallery such as this, as you can almost join them at any point, and this allows you to have to fill in yourself the allready minimal plot. 'Un Chien Andalou' (1929) is a classic, with certain elements transcending the fim itself. I remember being told about the more gruesome parts of this film by an enthusiastic art student at school. That it was filmed in 1929 and can still shock me and make me laugh out loud is a testament to it's originality. The follow up film L'Age d'or (1930) had it's great surreal moments, and was far more technically adept as a film, but it slowed slightly in places. Again though, it was shocking (probably the most scary shooting on a film I have ever seen) and amusing (a Pythonesque moment as a series of unrelated items, including a priest are propelled out a bed room window onto the ground below). The final scenes though had a truly daring representation of Christ, and it is no surprise to me that the film was banned after only ten days or release. The fact that neo-nazis hated it, and it was banned for fifty years makes me warm to it more than it probably deserves. Cow on a bed anyone?
The making of the Dali segment of 'Spellbound' (1945) were interesting, but this was the start of Dali repeatedly trying to get himself links with Hollywood, a union that was bound to fail. Dali was hardly going to American mainstream tastes in the 1940s. As a result it was not surprising that many of these collaberations came to nothing; the Spellbound piece was heavily editied, a collaberation with Fritz Lang was abandoned by the studio, even a promising year spent working on story boards at Disney was abandoned. Although, having said that the now finished 'Destino' (1946 +2003) is fantastic, a recreation of Dali paintings as animations which is a visual feast. Disney should be congratulated for having completed this piece so many years after shelving it. Time though was yet again against me, and I was unable to view 'Impressions of Upper Mongolia' (1975) and 'Chaos' (1960) fully, although, like many made for TV movies I doubted their abilty to match the celluloid efforts.
The paintings were fascinating, and I was able to drift into scenes of strange lands, where nothing seems to fit properly. I also saw another great portrait of an actor playing Richard III. Now stop me if I digress, but I din't start the year expecting to see one great portrait of an actor playing Richard III and I end up seeing two. How does this happen? The portrait of Olivier playing the aforementioned character was striking with it's alternative angles of the famous actors face. Hogarth's portrait of Garrett playing the evil king was equally striking, aloutgh it relied more on the way Garrett appeared to be mid oration.
The Tate also shoehorned in pieces from the permanent collection, therefore I had my obligatory meeting with the Lobster Telephone, which I have now seen in so many locations that I do believe it is breeding.